Super Tuesday is tomorrow, and something strange is happening in the presidential race. While having a female and a black candidate who have a chance at the presidency is certainly a first, there is a less obvious rarity at play in the race. In considering the evidence of leadership and achievement of each in the political realm (or in the civil realm, which may be even more significant), I realized that senators and congressmen really don’t have background and experience that would directly lends itself to being the President and Commander-in-Chief of the United States. While it might be obvious to some that a lawmaker doesn’t have proper training to become the leader of the free world, there has been no substantial discussion on the qualification of the candidates in the presidential race.
Here’s an interesting experiment: Go to wikipedia.com’s page on past US presidents. Do a little clicking around and count the number of past presidents who have their highest political ranking as senator before being elected president. How many? Did you have a guess beforehand? How does this number compare to your guess?
In my brief searching, it became quickly evident that most presidents are elected to the office either from a governorship or a vice presidency. As for the total number of senators who have been elected over the past 220 years or so? Two. (Correct me if I’m wrong!) The first was Warren G. Harding in 1921. However, he had previously served as lieutenant governor of Ohio so he did have more leadership experience than simply as a lawmaker. The second? John F. Kennedy, in one of the closest presidential elections in US history.
Besides the lack of significant leadership experience and razor-thin margins, I would argue that JFK as well as current candidates ride a wave of popularity from their cult of personality. Why do they have so many die-hard fans? (Why do Oprah or Steve Jobs have so many die-hard fans?) In the case of the presidential candidates, it has little to do with a carefully discerning electorate recognizing their qualifications and merits to be the next president of the United States, but more to do with a fascination with their celebrity status (hence my use of the term ‘fans’). Their rock star image is built up by careful PR and a swooning media machine that hopes beyond hope for their success. You may even have heard Obama referred to as his party’s Rock Star. Since a rock star ultimately makes a living by entertaining the masses, I wonder if this title isn’t entirely inappropriate. While Hillary was major media’s original pick for president, it seems that there has been a shift of allegiance over to her less “experienced”, but more star-studded and palatable counterpart.